The University of Arizona

Overall Language Performance Studies

Yearsort icon Design n Cl Ph Level Treatment d stats (#obs):
1989
G b/t
RCT
32 1 3 Systematic Therapy for Auditory Comprehension Disorders vs. stimulation
1990 SS 3 3 2 Oral Reading, Written word-picture matching
1991 SS 1 3 1 aud comp, Oral Reading, repetition, writing
1992
G b/t
RCT
43 2 1 Comp. reading vs. Comp. stimulation (non-language) vs. no tx
1992 Meta-analysis 2 3 Variety
1993
G b/t
RCT
60 3 1 formal speech therapy vs. stimulation tx provided by relatives
1995 CS 1 3 1 Family as caregivers
1995 G w/in 69 3 1 Not Specified
1995 G b/t 26 3 1 Not Specified
1995 G b/t 4 3 1 conversational tx vs. didactic & conversational tx
1995 G w/in 3 3 1 day treatment program

dir 0.093

1996 G b/t 17 1 2 Stimulation
1997 SS 8 3 1 Cooperative Group tx
1997 G b/t 55 1 3 Compter reading tx (CRT)
1997 G b/t 20 3 2 Group tx
1998 Meta-analysis 2 Tx for aphasia following stroke
1998 Meta-analysis 2 Outcomes for tx of aphasia
1999 G w/in 60 3 1 Computer administered tx
1999
G b/t
RCT
24 1 1 Group
1999 SS 20 3 1 Language comprehension tx
2000 G b/t 145 2 2 Not Specified
2000 Mixed 20 2 1 Volunteers trained to maximize communication
2001 G w/in 50 3 1 Computer administered tx
2001 CS 1 3 2 Not Specified
2001
G b/t
RCT
17 1 3 Constraint induced tx vs conventional tx